Positioning
The shelf a buyer files you on.
Not the words on your homepage. The category they judge you in, and the alternatives they judge you against.
- The category, in their words
- The three alternatives, including doing nothing
We take your market apart, tell you what it can and cannot give, then prove the plan on a small budget before anything scales.
Operators from these companies use it
Named by employer, because that is what is true. Individual practitioners, not a company endorsement.
Get the third right on top of a wrong first and you have paid to scale a mistake.
One B2B product marketer, 6+ years in GTM, running every engagement personally with AI agents trained on your positioning, customer calls and data. That is how one person covers ground an agency staffs with five. Nobody junior touches it.
Four steps, bought one at a time and taken in this order. Each one is priced on its own, and each one has to pay for itself before the next is worth buying.
You can stop after any step, and everything already done is yours to keep. No lock-in, no notice period, nothing to unwind.
One operator asks for more trust than an agency does. So the record is held where I cannot edit it, and the terms are written down before any money moves.
It is paid, which is the point. You get the positioning audit, the competitor teardown, the ICP read and the 30-day fix list as files you own and can hand to anyone. If the 90 days are not right for you, you keep the work and we are done.
Because it is different work, not more of the same work. The teardown is one week spent reading what you already have, and its job is to tell you whether there is a gap worth closing. Step two is up to six customer and lost-deal interviews, the full competitive set mapped, and positioning, ICP and a costed 90-day plan written out and handed over. That is several weeks of work, and it costs less than one bad quarter of ad spend. You only buy it if the teardown proved the gap is real.
A small monthly base covers the work. The rest is tied to targets we agree in writing before the 90 days start, normally qualified pipeline or revenue. Those targets come from what the teardown found about your market, not from what sounds good on a call. Miss the target and you do not pay that part.
Not unaided. The drafting, the research and the reporting run on AI agents trained on your own positioning, customer conversations and data, so the volume is machine speed and the judgement stays human and senior. That is what makes the base small enough to be worth your risk.
An agency is paid the same whether it works or not, scopes for months and hands the work to a junior. Here the entry is a fixed one-week teardown, the base after it is small, the rest is tied to agreed results, and one senior operator does the work.
No. They get the teardown, the 90-day plan and the weekly priorities, and we take the work they do not have the seniority or the hours for. Most founders keep the person and get considerably more out of them.
You see the same data we do. Weak market signal and we say so in the reality call, before the money moves. Strong signal with weak execution and we change the execution. Working and we scale it. No 12-month lock-in either way.
Not yet. This works for founders with real traction and stalled growth. If you are still hunting the first repeatable win, come back when you have it.
B2B tech and tech-enabled businesses. If you sell software, infrastructure or distribution through a digital funnel, we speak your language.
One week. One flat fee. No retainer, no call required.
Analyse My Business